2nd complant ftw!
Jan 15, 2012 15:55:40 GMT -7
Post by Rarilue on Jan 15, 2012 15:55:40 GMT -7
Name: loserX-L (a.k.a. Lue Zer Ex El, a.k.a Rarilue)
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Type of Complaint: Flame
Insident Link:reply #5, Screenshot of the post in original form
Complaint:
Age: 20
Gender: Male
Type of Complaint: Flame
Insident Link:
Complaint:
Solution:It`s self explanatory really due to the link and such provided. It`s a flame to the third degree (major). "Flame - There are three types of flames unintended (where you did not even mean to insult the other user), minor (where you insult the other user on the spur of the moment without thinking) and major (where it's clear you are calmly trying to cause maximum distress to someone else)." - From the complain template thread and can also be found in the basic rules thread
He used to be a damn mod ya`know? And really it honestly looked like he desired to do harm (toward me please don`t confuse of what it was aimed at). What I think would be a solution? A temporary ban. You know why?
-1. I don`t think the incident was severe enough for a permanent banishment.
-2. A verbal warning should be skipped due to his (former) status also the incident is too severe to be it a 1/3 warning.
-3. Read the post in the link again and you may see the last line of "I'll take my warning" after he had done the deed. So I can stick my foot up your ass 3 times, because nothing is going to happen to me if I don`t get further then the 3/3 warning right? Really, think about this and what I mean. And don`t just read off what I quoted please read the whole post as a whole and really think about it. (The post contained a quote to what he was referring to though you can look at the whole thread if you want).
-4. I`m pretty sure someone is going to post something like "he misunderstood", "he had a point", "temporary banned is too much", or w/e ya`know what I mean. So I would at least would like to see a 3/3 warning onto him for this.
-5. Again I say, as I mention before of his (former) status, if memory serves me right he was a mod not to long ago. And think again what the complain is, a flame that is considered major. And think about what I said in my 3rd point if you hadn`t.
-6. Last thing I wanna say, if you honestly think it should not get a temp-banned or even a 3/3 warning, there should be a 2/3 warning without a doubt even if you think if it was nothing.