cmon bro

[acids]

Name James
Age 21
Gender Male
Type of Complaint Misunderstanding, Mistreatment
Incident Link link 
Point of Reference link

Complaint

Why, rather, how is it that someone can get away with abusing the moderator power? I'm confused. Does it make one feel good to have a modicum amount of power on this site, srsly? Anyway, to the point of the thread.

I had a misunderstanding--regardless of how the title of the incident link is--with Kochou in support. How is it that he can pose that question in link 1 to a member that is not staff in link 2, yet without hesitation, seeks to give me a 33%? Dude, I don't care about the warning--keep it, that's fine as I did in fact, fail to keep from posting in the thread; I'm a man, not some boy who doesn't understand at what level power is supposed to be taken. Given the question being posed to Ryosuke, who isn't staff, I have to say that falls under mistreatment, with or without my receiving the 33%. The point I'm trying to get across is this: how can you say that what Ryosuke says in reply to your STAFF ONLY related support thread, depends on if you 1/2 him or 1/3 him? In previous attempts at me being assistant, I've never had so easy an opportunity to do that--I had to scour support threads and search for them.. not have a moderator give me a self-posed question to answer, that would reflect on his grade towards me. 

If anything, I personally feel that Kochou's actions have been above that of true moderator. I do not know what he talks about in PMs or even Skype, but obviously given my recent ban within the cbox, it's not friendly talk if any at all about me. Granted, I myself have said things via Skype that reflect my view on how he abuses his power; yet since it is outside of the forum, it can remain there. I hate feeling or looking like I am the victim here, when it is he who is a victim of his own power trip. I feel that his actions revolve around me attempting to become this or that, yet obviously now I can't, given my recent 33% that would hinder me from any promotion, despite it being unwarranted, in my opinion. I answered his question, if not clearer than Ryosuke did--perhaps I should be receiving a +1 towards my moderation skills, given that I delved through the entirety of the Hecate/dead body situation and not just post links of the village gates and the proceeding battle.

I don't care who posts here, but I would prefer for it to be someone who is not biased, or surrounded in the blue aura of favoritism, as this is what this seems to boil down to in the end, again, from my point of view/opinion. I have literally no problem with anyone on this site, save Okuda. Even then, we just goof around in the cbox when we seem to antagonize one another--he and I have since become somewhat friends on Skype and he was the only person that I didn't like. I'm not looking to get anyone in trouble or none of that, I don't get kicks out of it--this is an online forum, not someone I know in person who has wronged me. Again, given the question being posed to Ryosuke, I suspected for it to be open to just members, yet again, if this 33% is to stick, that's fine.

[Captain M]

I mean the way I read it, it's pretty simple Pups.

In the support title, it says only staff are allowed to reply. You replied, you were not supposed to, you get a warning.

The whole Ryosuke thing doesn't even have anything to do with you. It was a way to see if Ryosuke was staff material, and his answer was answered separately, in his application thread as was required.

I mean you don't want to get anyone in trouble, but you are making accusations toward Kochou, so if you get your way, he would get into trouble.

I feel like this is unnecessary, Pups, don't you think? It's 100% simple, that thread was marked in the title, only staff members. So why would you decide to just post in there and expect everything to be a-okay? I mean I have done the same thing in the past, having a support thread that I only wanted the staff to post in, and my wish was respected.

Let me know if anything is unclear in my post.

Xoxo
M

[acids]

how is it simple when the question was posed to staff only, not members seeking promotion. how is it fair, that one can decide whether or not to allow or deny someone a promotion based on a self-posed question. how is it fair, that when i answered the question correctly, i get punished for it? perhaps i should have made a thread titled "in reply to the eye situation" to keep from suffering from the 33%?

again, i know the ryosuke thing has nothing to do with me--hence it being a point of reference listed, to show those with opinions such as yourself what i am talking about in regards to the question.

[Captain M]

One last thing before I go work out.

Again, Ryosuke's answer was OUT of the thread. It was just a way to test him.

[acids]

to test him with a self-posed question, that has origins that involve a member wishing to find a better way than to waste a scrap? cmon bro.

[Captain M]

Don't cmon bro me! xD

Yes, it was a test to see how Ryosuke, someone who is applying to be part of staff, would answer such a question. It was answered OUTSIDE to the support thread, as requested.

You posted within that support thread, which was labelled as staff-only, hence the 33% warning.

From here on out, I shall let my fellow staff members deal with this issue as they have more experience and may be able to articulate better responses than I can.

[Deleted]

Here is the thing. Ko wasn't abusing staff power. Thats what staff is suppose to do. When someone posts in a thread that says "STAFF ONLY' it didn't matter if I posted or u did we would still both get a warning. People get questions all the time for staff applications. We even use questions that have been asked in support at times just so we have something. Its like saying that we should get a 33% cuz I answered the question in the cbox. The main thing for someone to be like "STAFF ONLY" is so that people don't clutter up and give different answers where staff can give an accurate answer as fast as possible. It is for the purpose of the cleanliness of the thread. I am like 90% sure Ko wouldn't want to have given u that warning. Its just something they HAVE to do.

Btw. Those first lines were really dramatic. Like woah. cmon dude

[👺 Usiel]

It's not abusing power. It said staff only, so staff only. Warning stays.